BosStr-icon

Richard Fleischer is a direc­tor whose career is way over­due for a reap­praisal.  Though some of his films are acknowl­edged as clas­sics — Narrow Margin and 20,000 Leagues Under The Sea are two good exam­ples — he is often dis­missed as a mere stu­dio jour­ney­man.  Like any pro­lific direc­tor, he’s got some duds in his back cat­a­log (par­tic­u­larly dur­ing its final stretch in the 1980′) but he’s got an even big­ger ros­ter of impres­sive films to his credit from the 1950’s through the 1970’s.

When Fleischer was paired with the right genre and the right script, he could really deliver.  Genres he showed a spe­cial flair for include film noir (Violent Saturday), sci­ence fic­tion (Fantastic Voyage) and the action film (Mr. Majestyk).

However, Fleischer’s most unique genre skill was his abil­ity to direct pow­er­ful true-crime fare about ser­ial killers.  For exam­ple, he crafted an excel­lent treat­ment of the Leopold-Loeb case in Compulsion and directed another factually-based cult fave in the chill­ing 10 Rillington Place.  That said, his best work in this unusual sub­genre is The Boston Strangler, an adap­ta­tion of Gerold Frank’s non­fic­tion book on the case.  From its cast­ing to its visual approach, it remains an unortho­dox and inspired piece of work.

Like a true police pro­ce­dural, The Boston Strangler starts with a crime, intro­duces the cops first and then works its way back to the killer. In 1963, Boston is ter­ror­ized by a series of mur­ders. All the vic­tims are women, all are sex­u­ally assaulted and the killer leaves a sig­na­ture on the scene by tying a piece of a women’s under­gar­ment around the vic­tims’ necks. John Bottomly (Henry Fonda) is assigned to the case against his will and does his best to fig­ure out the case using his ana­lyt­i­cal skills.

However, he doesn’t get a break until the killer gets sloppy — at the point, we are intro­ducer to Albert DeSalvo (Tony Curtis), a hard-working fam­ily man who is com­pelled to kill for rea­sons even he doesn’t under­stand. De Salvo is finally caught when he slips up, though the evi­dence is weak… and this forces Bottomly to try an unusual gam­bit to get a con­fes­sion out of De Salvo.

This is an unusual struc­ture for a Hollywood out­ing — and The Boston Strangler also gets an unusual visual approach to match it. Inspired by an art expo, Richard Fleischer chose to tell the story using a multi-panel split-screen for sev­eral sequences. Some crit­ics decry this tech­nique as mere flash but it actu­ally does a fine job putting the viewer on edge — there’s a great scene where a series of pan­els use p.o.v. cam­era angles to put the viewer in the killer’s shoes — and thus allow the filmmaker’s to con­vey the killer’s off-kilter mind­set. The multi-panel tech­nique is also used to great effect in a few scenes where it depicts how the mur­ders cause panic to rip­ple through the Boston community.

The Boston Strangler fur­ther ben­e­fits from strong per­for­mances. As usual, Fonda pro­vides a clas­sic Hollywood pres­ence as the everyman-type strug­gling to come to grips with the case. His all-American appeal lends an ele­ment of com­fort for the viewer that is sorely needed. He is backed up nicely by George Kennedy and Murray Hamilton, both effec­tively con­vey­ing the cyn­i­cism of cops with great cred­i­bil­ity.  There are also a few note­wor­thy cameos by actors play­ing some ini­tial sus­pects — the best is William Hickey as a tor­mented masochist whose odd behav­ior and obses­sions makes him a sus­pect. His expres­sion of hurt when he dis­cov­ers he is a sus­pect is quite pos­si­bly the most heart­break­ing moment in the film.

Finally, and most impor­tantly, Tony Curtis is a rev­e­la­tion as DeSalvo. Even though he doesn’t make his first appear­ance until the halfway mark, he owns this movie. He digs into the role with Method-acting fer­vor, using well-crafted makeup to dis­tort his mat­inée idol fea­tures and skill­fully phys­i­cal­iz­ing the con­flicted impulses of a man who has no idea why he is dri­ven to kill. The film’s finale hinges entirely upon his abil­ity to con­vey his abil­ity to word­lessly con­vey this inner tur­moil and Curtis pulls it off in a way that is unforgettable.

Simply put, The Boston Strangler is a mas­ter­piece that blends psy­cho­log­i­cal real­ism and extreme visual styl­iza­tion to pow­er­ful effect. Long before there was Silence Of The Lambs or a Seven, this movie con­veyed the ter­ri­fy­ing mind­set of a ser­ial killer with unflinch­ing pre­ci­sion.  It remains a neces­sity for stu­dents of the genre and one of finest achieve­ments of a direc­tor who deserves more praise than he often receives.